ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Predicting football match outcomes: a multilayer perceptron neural network model based on technical statistics indicators of the FIFA world Cup.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidimensional team performance indicators in men's UEFA EURO 2024: an exploratory analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper utilizes the strong non-linear approximation capability of a multilayer perceptron Neural Network to predict match outcomes based on Technical Statistics Indicators. Principal component analysis was applied to all the official data for dimensionality reduction and feature identification, resulting 22 technical statistics indicators. An architecture of a Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network with a 24-4-3 was constructed using SPSS. The results showed that the model achieved an overall prediction accuracy of 86.7%, the prediction accuracy for Draw is substantially lower than for the Win and Loss. The neural network model exhibited robust predictive performance. On this basis, five relevant topics were discussed, including model performance evaluation, relationship between TSI and match outcomes, discriminative power of TSI, impact of stage on prediction results and incorrect predictions of match. Thus, coaches can enhance the team's performance-oriented results under limited training resources by transforming the high-impact technical statistical indicators identified by the model into training priorities, thereby achieving data-driven scientific training management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.