ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
Generation of labeled leaf point clouds for plants trait estimation.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dataset of Temporally Consistent Instance Annotations for 4D Plant Phenotyping.Scientific data · 2026Article
- From Prediction to Creation: Generative Plant Design.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ground Mobile Robots for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review from the Closed-Loop Perspective of Perception, Decision, and Action.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, leaf trait estimation remains a labor-intensive process. The effort to obtain ground truth measurements limits how accurately this task can be performed automatically. Traditionally, plant scientists manually measure the traits of harvested leaves and associate them with sensor data, which is key for training machine learning approaches and to automate the processes. In this paper, we propose a neural network-based method to generate synthetic 3D point clouds of leaves with their associated traits to support approaches for phenotyping. We use real-world leaf point clouds to learn how to generate realistic leaves from a leaf skeleton, which is automatically extracted. We use the generated leaves to fine-tune different leaf trait estimation methods. We evaluate our generated data using different trait estimation methods and compare the results to using real-world data or other synthetic datasets from agricultural simulation software. Experiments show that our approach generates leaf point clouds with high similarity to real-world leaves. Tuning trait estimation methods on our generated data improves their performance in the estimation of real-world leaves' traits, making our data crucial for developing and testing data-driven trait estimation methods. Accurate trait estimation is key to understanding crop growth, productivity, and pest resistance, as leaf size directly influences photosynthesis, yield potential, and vulnerability to insects and fungal growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.