Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416199›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

Generation of labeled leaf point clouds for plants trait estimation.

Gianmarco Roggiolani, Brian N Bailey, Jens Behley, Cyrill Stachniss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gianmarco RoggiolaniCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, Germany.
Brian N BaileyDepartment of Plant Science, University of Davis, United States.
Jens BehleyCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, Germany.
Cyrill StachnissCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, leaf trait estimation remains a labor-intensive process. The effort to obtain ground truth measurements limits how accurately this task can be performed automatically. Traditionally, plant scientists manually measure the traits of harvested leaves and associate them with sensor data, which is key for training machine learning approaches and to automate the processes. In this paper, we propose a neural network-based method to generate synthetic 3D point clouds of leaves with their associated traits to support approaches for phenotyping. We use real-world leaf point clouds to learn how to generate realistic leaves from a leaf skeleton, which is automatically extracted. We use the generated leaves to fine-tune different leaf trait estimation methods. We evaluate our generated data using different trait estimation methods and compare the results to using real-world data or other synthetic datasets from agricultural simulation software. Experiments show that our approach generates leaf point clouds with high similarity to real-world leaves. Tuning trait estimation methods on our generated data improves their performance in the estimation of real-world leaves' traits, making our data crucial for developing and testing data-driven trait estimation methods. Accurate trait estimation is key to understanding crop growth, productivity, and pest resistance, as leaf size directly influences photosynthesis, yield potential, and vulnerability to insects and fungal growth.

Indexed as

3D plant phenotypingDeep learning for agricultureLeaf trait estimation

Identifiers

PMID41416199
PMCPMC12710001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.