Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416198›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

Panoptic segmentation for complete labeling of fruit microstructure in 3D micro-CT images with deep learning.

Leen Van Doorselaer, Pieter Verboven, Bart Nicolai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leen Van DoorselaerMechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS), Biosystems Department, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Pieter VerbovenMechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS), Biosystems Department, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Bart NicolaiMechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS), Biosystems Department, KU Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic processes in plant organs involving transport of water, metabolic gasses, and nutrients depend on the three-dimensional (3D) microscopic tissue morphology. However, imaging and quantifying this microstructure, including the spatial layout of parenchyma cells, pores, vascular bundles and special features such as stone cell clusters (brachysclereids), is challenging. To address this, a 3D deep learning-based panoptic segmentation model, combining semantic and instance segmentation, was developed to accelerate and improve microstructure characterization of apple and pear fruit tissue in X-ray micro-computed tomography (CT) images. In addition, various training datasets and data augmentation techniques, including synthetic data, were explored to enhance segmentation quality. The 3D panoptic segmentation achieved an Aggregated Jaccard Index of 0.89 and 0.77 for apple and pear tissue, respectively, outperforming both the previously designed 2D instance segmentation model and a marker-based watershed segmentation benchmark. The model successfully labeled vascular bundles with a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.51 in apple tissue and 0.79 in pear tissue, although thin vasculature in apple remained more challenging to segment. The 3D panoptic segmentation model achieved a DSC of 0.81 and effectively segmented stone cell clusters in pear tissue. Despite evaluating different methods to enhance segmentation quality, none improved test performance beyond that of the model trained on the standard dataset. The proposed 3D panoptic segmentation model offers the most complete automated protocol to date for plant tissue labelling and morphometric quantification from native X-ray micro-CT images, without extensive sample preparation such as contrast labelling. The developed method, if not replaces, drastically accelerates conventional human-in-the-loop analysis of such images.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFruit physiologyImage processingPlant microstructureX-ray micro-computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID41416198
PMCPMC12709988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.