ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
Panoptic segmentation for complete labeling of fruit microstructure in 3D micro-CT images with deep learning.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enabled Shrinkage Analysis and Morphology Control in Food Processing: Mechanisms, Multimodal Perception, Modeling, and Intelligent Regulation.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- A Multidimensional Approach to Cereal Caryopsis Development: Insights into Adlay (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic processes in plant organs involving transport of water, metabolic gasses, and nutrients depend on the three-dimensional (3D) microscopic tissue morphology. However, imaging and quantifying this microstructure, including the spatial layout of parenchyma cells, pores, vascular bundles and special features such as stone cell clusters (brachysclereids), is challenging. To address this, a 3D deep learning-based panoptic segmentation model, combining semantic and instance segmentation, was developed to accelerate and improve microstructure characterization of apple and pear fruit tissue in X-ray micro-computed tomography (CT) images. In addition, various training datasets and data augmentation techniques, including synthetic data, were explored to enhance segmentation quality. The 3D panoptic segmentation achieved an Aggregated Jaccard Index of 0.89 and 0.77 for apple and pear tissue, respectively, outperforming both the previously designed 2D instance segmentation model and a marker-based watershed segmentation benchmark. The model successfully labeled vascular bundles with a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.51 in apple tissue and 0.79 in pear tissue, although thin vasculature in apple remained more challenging to segment. The 3D panoptic segmentation model achieved a DSC of 0.81 and effectively segmented stone cell clusters in pear tissue. Despite evaluating different methods to enhance segmentation quality, none improved test performance beyond that of the model trained on the standard dataset. The proposed 3D panoptic segmentation model offers the most complete automated protocol to date for plant tissue labelling and morphometric quantification from native X-ray micro-CT images, without extensive sample preparation such as contrast labelling. The developed method, if not replaces, drastically accelerates conventional human-in-the-loop analysis of such images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.