ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
Analysis of Wheat Spike Morphological Traits by 2D Imaging.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ZCAT: Zero-shot cross-crop annotation transfer-A new paradigm leveraging plant organ similarity.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Wheat spike and spikelet detection and counting from high-resolution digital imagery using YOLO with Oriented Bounding Boxes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Forward Genetics Strategy for High-Throughput Gene Identification via Precise Image-Based Phenotyping of an Indexed EMS Mutant Library.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheat spike morphology plays a critical role in determining grain yield and has garnered significant interest in genetics and breeding research. However, traditional measurement methods are limited to simple traits and fail to capture complex spike phenotypes with high precision, thus limiting progress in yield-related trait analysis. In this study, a deep learning pipeline, called Speakerphone, for acquiring precise wheat spike phenotypes was developed. Our pipeline achieved a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.948 in spike segmentation. Additionally, the spike traits measured by our method strongly agreed with the manually measured values, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.9865 for spike length, 0.9753 for the number of spikelets per spike, and 0.9635 for fertile spikelets. Using experimental data of 221 wheat cultivars from various regions of Zhao County, Hebei Province, China, our pipeline extracted 45 phenotypes and analyzed their correlations with thousand-grain weight (TGW) and spike yield. Our findings indicate that precise measurements of spike area, spikelet area, and other phenotypic traits clarify the correlation between spike morphology and wheat yield. Through hierarchical clustering on the basis of spike morphology, we categorized wheat spikes into six classes and identified the phenotypic differences among these classes and their effects on TGW and yield. Furthermore, phenotypic differences among wheat cultivars from different geographical regions and over decades were revealed in this study, with an increase in the number of large-spike cultivars over time, especially in southern China. This research may help breeders understand the relationship between wheat spike morphology and yield, thus providing an important basis for future wheat breeding efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.