Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416196›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

Multi-modal few-shot learning for anthesis prediction of individual wheat plants.

Yiting Xie, Stuart J Roy, Rhiannon K Schilling, Huajian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yiting XieUniversity of Adelaide, Australia.
Stuart J RoyUniversity of Adelaide, Australia.
Rhiannon K SchillingUniversity of Adelaide, Australia.
Huajian LiuUniversity of Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthesis prediction is crucial for breeding wheat. While current tools provide estimates of average anthesis at the field scale, they fail to address the needs of breeders who require accurate predictions for individual plants. Hybrid breeders have to finalize their plans for pollination at least 10 days before such flowering is due and biotechnology field trials in the United States and Australia must report to regulators 7-14 days before the first plant flowers. Currently, predicting anthesis of individual wheat plants is a labour-intensive, inefficient, and costly process. Individual wheat of the same cultivar within the same field may exhibit substantial variations in anthesis timing, due to significant variations in their immediate surroundings. In this study, we developed an efficient and cost-effective machine vision approach to predict anthesis of individual wheat plants. By integrating RGB imagery with in-situ meteorological data, our multimodal framework simplifies the anthesis prediction problem into binary or three-class classification tasks, aligning with breeders' requirements in individual wheat flowering prediction on the crucial days before anthesis. Furthermore, we incorporated a few-shot learning method to improve the model's adaptability across different growth environments and to address the challenge of limited training data. The model achieved an F1 score above 0.8 in all planting settings.

Indexed as

Anthesis predictionFew-shot learningIndividual wheat phenotypingMultimodal approachPlant phenomics

Identifiers

PMID41416196
PMCPMC12709996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.