ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
Automatic 3D Plant Organ Instance Segmentation Method Based on PointNeXt and Quickshift+.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- HAE-Net: A hierarchy-aware enhanced method for 3D panoptic segmentation in orchard scenes.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Dual-guided asymmetric MP-former for rice root instance segmentation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Pepper-4D: Spatiotemporal 3D Pepper Crop Dataset for Phenotyping.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ELGCot3D: a lightweight 3D cotton point cloud segmentation model based on EdgeConv-Local Attention-GCN and semantic feature enhancement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- KAN-GLNet: An enhanced PointNet++ model for canola silique segmentation and counting.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ instance segmentation of 3D plant point clouds is a crucial prerequisite for organ-level phenotype estimation. However, most current cloud segmentation methods are usually designed for specific crop, hardly fit for both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous crops which have significant structural differences. This study therefore proposed a two-stage method with higher generalization ability for single-plant organ instance segmentation based on PointNeXt and Quickshift++. The effectiveness of this method was tested on different types of crops. The dataset includes point clouds of 122 self-acquired sugarcanes, 49 open-accessed maizes, and 77 open-accessed tomatoes. The improved PointNeXt model was trained to implement the semantic segmentation of stems and leaves. The average mOA and mIoU on the test set reaches 96.96 % and 87.15 %, respectively. The Quickshift++ algorithm was then applied to encode the global spatial structure and local connections of plants for rapid localization and segmentation of leaf instance. Our approach outperformed four SOTA methods, ASIS, JSNet, DFSP, and PSegNet in terms of both quantitative and qualitative segmentation results, achieving average values for mPrec, mRec, mF1, and mIoU of 93.32 %, 85.60 %, 87.94 %, and 81.46 %, respectively. The proposed method also yields excellent results for several other plants in their early stages, indicating its generalization ability and applicability for organ instance segmentation for different plants, thus providing a powerful tool for plant phenotypic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.