Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416183›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

TM-WSNet: A precise segmentation method for individual rubber trees based on UAV LiDAR point cloud.

Lele Yan, Guoxiong Zhou, Miying Yan, Xiangjun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lele YanCentral South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Guoxiong ZhouCentral South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Miying YanCentral South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
Xiangjun WangRubber Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, Hainan, 571101, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubber products have become an important strategic resource in the global economy. However, individual rubber tree segmentation in plantation environments remains challenging due to canopy background interference and significant morphological variations among trees. To address these issues, we propose a high-precision segmentation network,TM-WSNet (Spatial Geometry Enhanced Hybrid Feature Extraction Module-Wavelet Grid Feature Fusion Encoder Segmentation Network). First, we introduce SGTramba, a hybrid feature extraction module combining Grouped Transformer and Mamba architectures, designed to reduce confusion between tree crown boundaries and surrounding vegetation or background elements. Second, we propose the WGMS encoder, which enhances structural feature recognition by applying wavelet-based spatial grid downsampling and multiscale feature fusion, effectively handling variations in canopy shape and tree height. Third, a scale optimization algorithm (SCPO) is developed to adaptively search for the optimal learning rate, addressing uneven learning across different resolution scales. We evaluate TM-WSNet on a self-constructed dataset (RubberTree) and two public datasets (ShapeNetPart and ForestSemantic), where it consistently achieves high segmentation accuracy and robustness. In practical field tests, our method accurately predicts key rubber tree parameters-height, crown width, and diameter at breast height with coefficients of determination (R

Indexed as

Hybrid feature extraction moduleMulti-level feature fusionRubber tree segmentationScale optimization algorithmWavelet grid sampling

Identifiers

PMID41416183
PMCPMC12709891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.