ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2025
The First Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale as a Measure of Quality of Care.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- What systems must protect: relational care, uncertainty and recovery in early psychosis care.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Fidelity, Implementation Determinants, and Patient-Level Outcomes Following Initial Implementation of NAVIGATE in the Early Psychosis Intervention-Spreading Evidence-Based Treatment (EPI-SET) Study.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- A Mixed Methods Study of Program-Level Factors Influencing Patient and Family Engagement in First Episode Psychosis Coordinated Specialty Care.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The development and evaluation of the Patient-Controlled Admission Fidelity Checklist.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Implementation Fidelity in Early Intervention for Eating Disorders-A Multisite Pilot Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- NAV-FS: A first episode psychosis services fidelity scale adapted for the NAVIGATE model.Schizophrenia research · 2025Article
- Intervention Programmes for First-Episode Psychosis: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Identification of Psychosis Risk and Diagnosis of First-Episode Psychosis: Advice for Clinicians.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024Review
- Expanding Early Psychosis Care across a Large and Diverse State: Implementation Lessons Learned from Administrative Data and Clinical Team Leads in Texas.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Article
- Article
- Intervention Programs for First-Episode Psychosis: A Scoping Review Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fidelity scales are designed to assess the degree to which a program delivers the core components of evidence-based programs. The degree to which scales can predict outcomes-its predictive validity-is an important psychometric property. Fidelity scales have multiple applications, including in quality assurance and improvement. The purpose of this study was to assess the degree to which the First Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale (FEPS-FS) assesses the 6 domains of quality of care (QoC) described in the Institute of Medicine (IOM)'s QoC framework. Study Design: A quality thematic analysis using a theoretical (deductive) approach was used to categorize the 36 items of the FEPS-FS according to the framework for evaluating QoC outlined by the IOM. Two coders independently reviewed and coded each item in duplicate. Frequency counts were used to summarize the characteristics of the FEPS-FS items across the IOM's quality domains. Study Results: Most FEPS-FS items reflect effectiveness (47.2%), efficiency (19.59%), and patient-centeredness (18.56%). Safety (7.22%), timeliness (5.15%), and equity (2.06%) were relatively underrepresented. Conclusions: The FEPS-FS can be considered as a measure of QoC that reflects all the IOM domains. As expected for a fidelity scale, the largest number of items assess effectiveness, while safety, timeliness, and equity were represented by fewer items. We identified potential items from the literature that could be used to increase the proportion of items in underrepresented quality domains in future iterations of the FEPS-FS or other fidelity scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.