Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416113›Full record

ArticleSankhya. Series B. [Methodological.]2023

Regression Trees and Ensemble for Multivariate Outcomes.

Evan L Reynolds, Brian C Callaghan, Michael Gaies, Mousumi Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sankhya. Series B. [Methodological.], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evan L ReynoldsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-8436
Brian C CallaghanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Michael GaiesUniversity of Cincinnati, Ann Arbor, USA.
Mousumi BanerjeeUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

Machine Learning Tools for Prognostication in MelanomaR21CA152775 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BANERJEE, MOUSUMI · 2011 to 2012
$354k
Predicting complications of diabetes with longitudinal metabolic trajectoriesK99DK129785 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REYNOLDS, EVAN L · 2022 to 2023
$182k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA152775NIDDK NIH HHS K99 DK129785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tree-based methods have become one of the most flexible, intuitive, and powerful analytic tools for exploring complex data structures. The best documented, and arguably most popular uses of tree-based methods are in biomedical research, where multivariateoutcomes occur commonly (e.g. diastolic and systolic blood pressure and nerve conduction measures in studies of neuropathy). Existing tree-based methods for multivariate outcomes do not appropriately take into account the correlation that exists in such data. In this paper, we develop goodness-of-split measures for building multivariate regression trees for continuous multivariate outcomes. We propose two general approaches: minimizing within-node homogeneity and maximizing between-node separation. Within-node homogeneity is measured using the average Mahalanobis distance and the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix. Between-node separation is measured using the Mahalanobis distance, Euclidean distance and standardized Euclidean distance. To enhance prediction accuracy we extend the single multivariate regression tree to an ensemble of multivariate trees. Extensive simulations are presented to examine the properties of our goodness-of-split measures. Finally, the proposed methods are illustrated using two clinical datasets of neuropathy and pediatric cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

68W01clinical interpretabilitymachine learningMahalanobis distanceMultivariate outcomesPrimary 62H30regression treesSecondary 62P10

Identifiers

PMID41416113
PMCPMC12711322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.