ArticleSankhya. Series B. [Methodological.]2023
Regression Trees and Ensemble for Multivariate Outcomes.
Article in Sankhya. Series B. [Methodological.], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data-based regression models for predicting remifentanil pharmacokinetics.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tree-based methods have become one of the most flexible, intuitive, and powerful analytic tools for exploring complex data structures. The best documented, and arguably most popular uses of tree-based methods are in biomedical research, where multivariateoutcomes occur commonly (e.g. diastolic and systolic blood pressure and nerve conduction measures in studies of neuropathy). Existing tree-based methods for multivariate outcomes do not appropriately take into account the correlation that exists in such data. In this paper, we develop goodness-of-split measures for building multivariate regression trees for continuous multivariate outcomes. We propose two general approaches: minimizing within-node homogeneity and maximizing between-node separation. Within-node homogeneity is measured using the average Mahalanobis distance and the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix. Between-node separation is measured using the Mahalanobis distance, Euclidean distance and standardized Euclidean distance. To enhance prediction accuracy we extend the single multivariate regression tree to an ensemble of multivariate trees. Extensive simulations are presented to examine the properties of our goodness-of-split measures. Finally, the proposed methods are illustrated using two clinical datasets of neuropathy and pediatric cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.