Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416107›Full record

ReviewBiodesign research2025

Designing thermophilic, synthetic microbial communities for consolidated bioprocessing.

Hansen Tjo, Kelly Blundin, Jonathan M Conway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biodesign research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hansen TjoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Kelly BlundinDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Jonathan M ConwayDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lignocellulose-derived fuels and chemicals are vital to breaking the world's dependence on fossil fuels. Though plant biomass is notoriously resistant to deconstruction, lignocellulolytic thermophiles are especially adept at degrading its constituent polysaccharides into mono- and oligo-saccharides for catabolism. And many thermophiles, whether lignocellulolytic or not, can be engineered to ferment lignocellulose-derived sugars into valuable fuels and chemicals as part of consolidated bioprocesses. Although the past twenty years have seen major advances in the genetic and metabolic engineering of individual thermophiles, the strategy of co-culturing thermophilic strains as part of synthetic communities has not been well established. Synthetic communities unlock synergistic interactions that outperform monocultures, thereby enhancing product titers, rates, and yields. While limited genetic tools once hindered the development of synthetic thermophilic communities, recent advances now offer robust systems for engineering these industrially relevant organisms. Here, we propose that this expanded genetic malleability enables engineering of 1) transport specialization to reduce substrate competition between strains and 2) division of labor strategies whereby one strain focuses on lignocellulose deconstruction while another strain dedicates metabolic burden for product synthesis. We draw on examples of engineered thermophiles like

Indexed as

BiofuelCo-culturesConsolidated bioprocessingDivision of laborLignocelluloseMicrobial communitiesSubstrate specializationThermophile

Identifiers

PMID41416107
PMCPMC12709956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.