Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416025›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025

Regression Rate of Basal Cell Carcinoma in a Veteran Population: A Study of 317 Cases at the Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Margaryta Stoieva, Daniel Mettman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margaryta StoievaDr. Stoieva and Dr. Mettman are with the University of Kansas School of Medicine in Kansas City, Kansas.
Daniel MettmanDr. Stoieva and Dr. Mettman are with the University of Kansas School of Medicine in Kansas City, Kansas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to assess the regression rate of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in excision specimens following diagnostic biopsies obtained from patients in a veterans affairs facility.

methodsA retrospective review of biopsy-proven BCC excision cases was conducted. All included biopsy and corresponding excision reports were reviewed to determine the margin status of specimens. Proportion of residual carcinoma cases and regression rate of the tumor were determined.

resultsRegression rate of BCC was estimated to be 47%. The most prevalent subtype was nodular BCC (46%), and the most prevalent location was the head. Tumors located on the trunk and upper extremities were more likely to regress, and those on the head were less likely to regress ( LIMITATIONS: The limitation of our study is that the data may not be generalizable due to our unique study population.

conclusionBCC is a tumor with the potential to regress. However, definitive management resides in complete surgical excision, which will most likely remain the mainstay of treatment in the near future.

Indexed as

Basal cell carcinomabiopsyexcisionregressionveteran

Identifiers

PMID41416025
PMCPMC12710995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.