ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
From the Masterclasses in Dermatology 2025 Meeting: Practical Approaches to Cutaneous and Systemic Lupus for Dermatologists.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may occur independently or in association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). When systemic disease is present, CLE is the first manifestation in nearly one-third of cases. This positions dermatologists as key stakeholders in early detection of systemic disease, underscoring the importance of appropriate screening among this population. Various CLE subtypes carry distinct risks of systemic progression, with acute CLE closely tied to active SLE, subacute CLE conferring moderate risk, and most chronic subtypes (eg, localized discoid lupus) remaining limited to the skin. This review provides a practical, dermatology-focused framework for risk stratification, screening, and comanagement of patients with CLE. To support clinical decision-making and expand awareness, we introduce the "LABS FOR" SLE mnemonic to guide laboratory evaluation and propose an updated visual algorithm that illustrates screening and monitoring practices. We synthesize evidence-based and expert-informed recommendations, including serologic, demographic, clinical, and genetic predictors of systemic involvement. The 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria-requiring antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity and weighted domain scoring-are reviewed and compared to other diagnostic aids. Additionally, we highlight appropriate ANA testing, the importance of symptom review, and targeted second-line labs. Finally, we discuss collaborative management strategies with rheumatology, including organ-specific therapeutic considerations. By adopting a structured, CLE-informed approach to systemic screening and follow-up, dermatologists can play a critical role in improving outcomes for patients across the lupus spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41416023PMC12710992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.