ReviewCureus2025
Virtual Reality Simulation for Orthopedic Surgical Training: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Educational Impact.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating problem-based learning with virtual simulation in trauma orthopedic education: effects on learning outcomes and student satisfaction.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- e-Learning, Distance Education, and Virtual and Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Training: European Cross-Sectional Survey of Trainee Acceptance Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Using design thinking to identify training needs in CPR education: a qualitative study with nursing students and professionals.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) simulation represents a significant advancement in orthopedic surgical training, offering a powerful supplement to traditional educational paradigms. This review highlights robust evidence demonstrating that VR is an excellent educational tool, capable of bridging the gaps left by reduced work hours and ethical considerations associated with traditional clinical training. A recent meta-analysis confirms that VR interventions significantly improve trainees' knowledge scores, clinical operation scores, and surgical design capabilities compared to conventional methods. This enhanced level of competency, dexterity, and spatial awareness is evident across diverse applications, including arthroscopy, total hip replacement planning, and trauma fixation. VR's ability to provide a safe, repeatable, and accessible learning environment facilitates skill acquisition that has shown transferability to the operating room. Despite these benefits, challenges remain, including technical limitations like system latency, difficulties with depth awareness, and the potential for cognitive overload or inattentional blindness. Crucially, many existing orthopedic trauma simulators require rigorous validation of their concurrent and transfer validity to ensure they meet the standards of established training models. Future advancements are expected to integrate biomechanical analysis for fracture repair and artificial intelligence to enhance intraoperative decision-making. As these technologies mature and undergo validation according to standardized guidelines, VR is poised to become an indispensable component of orthopedic education, improving surgical accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.