Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416020›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Virtual Reality Simulation for Orthopedic Surgical Training: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Educational Impact.

Ali Soffar, Ahmed Elkohail, Mohamed Elbanna, Hassan A Kassem, Siddhartha Murhekar, Mohammed S Millat, Abdelrahman Sayed, Rafat Shehata, Moaaz Ali Hamoud, Nervana Khalil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali SoffarTrauma and Orthopedics, Princess Royal University Hospital and Orpington Hospital, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Ahmed ElkohailTrauma and Orthopedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Mohamed ElbannaTrauma and Orthopedics, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, London, GBR.
Hassan A KassemGeneral Internal Medicine, King's College London, London, GBR.
Siddhartha MurhekarTrauma and Orthopedics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, GBR.
Mohammed S MillatTrauma and Orthopedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Abdelrahman SayedTrauma and Orthopedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Cardiff, GBR.
Rafat ShehataEmergency Medicine, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, GBR.
Moaaz Ali HamoudOrthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, EGY.
Nervana KhalilPediatric Surgery, Mansoura University Children Hospital, Mansoura, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) simulation represents a significant advancement in orthopedic surgical training, offering a powerful supplement to traditional educational paradigms. This review highlights robust evidence demonstrating that VR is an excellent educational tool, capable of bridging the gaps left by reduced work hours and ethical considerations associated with traditional clinical training. A recent meta-analysis confirms that VR interventions significantly improve trainees' knowledge scores, clinical operation scores, and surgical design capabilities compared to conventional methods. This enhanced level of competency, dexterity, and spatial awareness is evident across diverse applications, including arthroscopy, total hip replacement planning, and trauma fixation. VR's ability to provide a safe, repeatable, and accessible learning environment facilitates skill acquisition that has shown transferability to the operating room. Despite these benefits, challenges remain, including technical limitations like system latency, difficulties with depth awareness, and the potential for cognitive overload or inattentional blindness. Crucially, many existing orthopedic trauma simulators require rigorous validation of their concurrent and transfer validity to ensure they meet the standards of established training models. Future advancements are expected to integrate biomechanical analysis for fracture repair and artificial intelligence to enhance intraoperative decision-making. As these technologies mature and undergo validation according to standardized guidelines, VR is poised to become an indispensable component of orthopedic education, improving surgical accuracy and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

arthroscopybone traumahaptic feedbackmedical educationorthopedic surgeryrehabilitationsimulationsurgical trainingtotal hip replacementvirtual reality (vr)

Identifiers

PMID41416020
PMCPMC12709385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.