Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416019›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of Myocardial Viability by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.

Ajay Bhatta, Arun Maskey, Nirmal P Neupane, Anupam Bista, Sudip Lamsal, Astha Wagle, Susmita Gyawali, Nirmal Ghimire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Romosozumab in older adults: real-world patterns in fracture liaison service cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ajay BhattaDepartment of Medicine, Geta Hospital, Kailali, NPL.
Arun MaskeyDepartment of Cardiology, Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, Kathmandu, NPL.
Nirmal P NeupaneDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, Kathmandu, NPL.
Anupam BistaDepartment of Medicine, Bharatpur Hospital, Chitwan, NPL.
Sudip LamsalDepartment of Cardiology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, NPL.
Astha WagleDepartment of Pathology, KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, NPL.
Susmita GyawaliCentral Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine - Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, NPL.
Nirmal GhimireDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nepal Police Hospital, Kathmandu, NPL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Following myocardial infarction (MI), patients may develop significant ventricular dysfunction, and many others may harbor a burden of residual coronary disease, for which viability assessment of the suspected myocardial territory may be needed. Thus, this study aimed to assess the viability of myocardium by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with MI and compare it with wall motion abnormality in echocardiography. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was conducted at Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre and Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. A total of 90 patients with a history of MI who underwent cardiac MRI were enrolled from May 12, 2023, to May 11, 2024. Echocardiography was analyzed for wall motion abnormalities and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), while cardiac MRI was analyzed for wall motion abnormalities, LVEF, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Myocardial segments were divided into those with LGE ≤50% (viable) and those with LGE >50% (non-viable). Wall motion abnormality by echocardiography and LGE by cardiac MRI were assessed for each segment and compared. Results Out of a total of 1,530 myocardial segments in 90 patients, 431 segments showed LGE on cardiac MRI, out of which 38 segments had LGE ≤50%, and 393 segments had LGE >50%. Most of the myocardial segments with LGE on cardiac MRI were in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery territory. All 38 segments that showed LGE ≤50% showed hypokinesia on echocardiogram. None of these segments showed akinesia or dyskinesia on echocardiogram. The majority of the segments with LGE >50% showed akinesia on echocardiogram, followed by hypokinesia and dyskinesia. None of the segments with LGE >50% had normal wall motion. Conclusion Cardiac MRI is an accurate and reliable tool to assess cardiac volumes, function, and LGE, thus determining the extent and severity of infarcted myocardium. Wall motion abnormalities by echocardiography, based on their severity, can also help to predict which involved myocardium may be viable and thus benefit in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseaseechocardiographylate gadolinium enhancementmriviability

Identifiers

PMID41416019
PMCPMC12709555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.