ReviewCureus2025
Unpacking Mentorship: A Review of Its Role in Contemporary Postgraduate Surgical Education.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mentorship is a cornerstone of postgraduate surgical education, supporting the development of clinical competence, research capability, professional identity, and psychological well-being. Despite its recognised importance, access to effective mentorship during surgical training remains inconsistent. This review aimed to evaluate the role, impact, and challenges of mentorship within postgraduate surgical education. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive searches of Ovid Medline, Embase, and Emcare identified studies published between 2015 and 2025 that examined mentorship in surgical residency programs. Eligible studies explored mentorship models, outcomes, and implementation strategies. Data were extracted on study design, participant characteristics, mentorship approaches, and key outcomes. Due to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised narratively. In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a range of surgical specialties and mentorship formats. Mentorship demonstrated consistent benefits across multiple domains. Structured programs enhanced academic productivity, with mentored residents producing more publications, engaging in research, and achieving greater scholarly output. Mentorship also improved technical skills, procedural confidence, and reflective practice. Professionally, mentored trainees reported stronger leadership development, clearer career trajectories, and higher examination success. Psychosocially, mentorship was associated with reduced burnout, improved confidence, and greater work-life balance. Peer and near-peer mentoring models further strengthened collegiality and accessibility. However, barriers such as limited time, inadequate mentor training, and inconsistent institutional support were frequently reported. Mentorship is integral to postgraduate surgical training, offering substantial academic, clinical, and professional benefits. Structured, well-resourced programs with protected time, trained mentors, and formal institutional recognition yield the most sustainable outcomes. Future initiatives should focus on standardised evaluation frameworks, long-term impact assessment, and innovative mentorship delivery models. Embedding mentorship as a core component of surgical education is essential for cultivating competent, resilient, and future-ready surgical professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.