Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416016›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Unpacking Mentorship: A Review of Its Role in Contemporary Postgraduate Surgical Education.

Daniel Thomas, Thomas Oldfield, Hannah Bamford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel ThomasUrology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, GBR.
Thomas OldfieldSurgery, Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, GBR.
Hannah BamfordPlastic Surgery, Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust, Wakefield, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentorship is a cornerstone of postgraduate surgical education, supporting the development of clinical competence, research capability, professional identity, and psychological well-being. Despite its recognised importance, access to effective mentorship during surgical training remains inconsistent. This review aimed to evaluate the role, impact, and challenges of mentorship within postgraduate surgical education. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive searches of Ovid Medline, Embase, and Emcare identified studies published between 2015 and 2025 that examined mentorship in surgical residency programs. Eligible studies explored mentorship models, outcomes, and implementation strategies. Data were extracted on study design, participant characteristics, mentorship approaches, and key outcomes. Due to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised narratively. In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a range of surgical specialties and mentorship formats. Mentorship demonstrated consistent benefits across multiple domains. Structured programs enhanced academic productivity, with mentored residents producing more publications, engaging in research, and achieving greater scholarly output. Mentorship also improved technical skills, procedural confidence, and reflective practice. Professionally, mentored trainees reported stronger leadership development, clearer career trajectories, and higher examination success. Psychosocially, mentorship was associated with reduced burnout, improved confidence, and greater work-life balance. Peer and near-peer mentoring models further strengthened collegiality and accessibility. However, barriers such as limited time, inadequate mentor training, and inconsistent institutional support were frequently reported. Mentorship is integral to postgraduate surgical training, offering substantial academic, clinical, and professional benefits. Structured, well-resourced programs with protected time, trained mentors, and formal institutional recognition yield the most sustainable outcomes. Future initiatives should focus on standardised evaluation frameworks, long-term impact assessment, and innovative mentorship delivery models. Embedding mentorship as a core component of surgical education is essential for cultivating competent, resilient, and future-ready surgical professionals.

Indexed as

ent surgeonhealth professional educationmentor-mentee programmentorship programobstetrics & gynaecologyplastic surgeonsresident surgeonspeciality registrarsurgery generalsurgical careers

Identifiers

PMID41416016
PMCPMC12710445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.