ArticleHealth services insights2025
Examining the Cost-Effectiveness of Introducing Patient Navigation Services for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among a Low-Income and Uninsured Population.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence rate among the uninsured population in the United States (US) is lower than the overall rate across all US adults aged 45 to 75. Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of community health worker (CHW) navigation services promoting CRC screening in a low-income, uninsured population. Methods: Using internal cost and effectiveness data from the Texas A&M Cancer Screening, Training, Education, and Prevention (CSTEP) program, which included 3196 participants, along with published sources such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations, we estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for CRC screening with CHW navigation versus usual care. The analysis was conducted from a societal perspective using Excel-based modeling in hypothetical cohorts initiating screening at age 45. Results: Under base-case assumptions, a 10 percentage-point improvement in CRC screening attributable to the program increased LYG by 0.160 at an additional lifetime cost of $101, resulting in an ICER of $3098 per LYG. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses were conducted, varying program costs, screening rate improvements, lifetime CRC costs, and life-years gained (LYG). Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance of CHW navigation services incorporating CRC screening promotion strategies tailored to uninsured populations to alleviate disparities in colorectal cancer screening and outcomes. Further research should consider the characteristics of uninsured populations, and the applicability of the program targeted for various types of underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.