ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025
Appropriate use of steroids for patients with generalized Myasthenia Gravis: an international Delphi study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Rescue Therapy to Mechanism-Based Sequencing in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Narrative Review with an Illustrative Clinical Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone is associated with faster symptom improvement in persistent ocular myasthenia gravis: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Assessing efgartigimod dosing patterns and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living outcomes in clinical practice: results from a large patient support program database.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used in the management of autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis (MG), often in high doses for prolonged periods. Exposure to OCS is associated with significant and cumulative adverse effects. There is currently no universal consensus on the approach to OCS use in MG. Objectives: To reach a multinational consensus on the appropriate use of OCS in MG, including the role of treatment approaches to minimize dose and support tapering. Design: This modified Delphi study established consensus among a panel of 70 general neurologists/neuromuscular specialists from eight countries over two rounds of survey to establish best practice principles regarding the use of OCS in MG. Methods: The current literature on OCS use in MG was reviewed. Topics of interest were identified, and a modified Delphi consensus process was created. A steering committee of six experts in MG proposed statements for testing with the wider panel over two rounds of surveys. Consensus was reached if at least 75% agreed or strongly agreed on a 4-point Likert scale. Results: Consensus was achieved for all 37 final statements. These statements covered principles of OCS use, including a target for long-term use of ⩽5 mg/day; the role of biologic treatments in minimizing required OCS dose; the need for individualization of approach according to patient factors; and the need for detailed guidance regarding how and when to taper OCS dose. Conclusion: These findings reinforce a shift in the management of MG, advocating for the judicious and sparing use of OCS against the backdrop of expanding therapeutic options. As additional evidence-based data emerge, these recommendations should be updated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.