ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
LKNet: Enhancing rice canopy panicle counting accuracy with an optimized point-based framework.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- VT-SCC: Visual-text semantic alignment via multimodal guidance for unified staple crop organ counting.aBIOTECH · 2026Article
- FG-LCNet: A two-stage foreground-guided network for whole-tree litchi counting.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Location-based methods for counting rice panicles have often been underestimated, primarily due to their perceived inferior performance when compared to detection-based techniques. However, we argue that the potential of these location-based methods has not been fully realized, largely owing to the limitations of existing model architectures. In response to this challenge, we introduce LKNet, an innovative model developed on the foundation of the location-based framework P2Pnet. To enhance the performance of panicle counting across diverse types and growth stages, we implemented several key strategies. Firstly, we reconstructed the localization loss function as a predictive probability distribution to reduce the influence of manual labeling. Additionally, we dynamically adapted the receptive field to better accommodate different panicle types through the use of large kernel convolutional blocks. We evaluated LKNet on several publicly available counting task datasets and achieved state-of-the-art performance on the Diverse Rice Panicle Detection dataset. Furthermore, we employed a rice panicle dataset collected at an altitude of 7 m, which includes various panicle types and growth stages for model training and evaluation. The results showed that LKNet effectively accommodates variations in panicle morphology, with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.