Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415957›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

PlantCaFo: An efficient few-shot plant disease recognition method based on foundation models.

Xue Jiang, Jiashi Wang, Kai Xie, Chenxi Cui, Aobo Du, Xianglong Shi, Wanneng Yang, Ruifang Zhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Research Progress of Peach Bacterial Spot Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xue JiangCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Jiashi WangCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Kai XieCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Chenxi CuiCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Aobo DuCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Xianglong ShiCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Wanneng YangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.
Ruifang ZhaiCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although plant disease recognition is highly important in agricultural production, traditional methods face challenges due to the high costs associated with data collection and the scarcity of samples. Few-shot plant disease identification tasks, which are based on transfer learning, can learn feature representations from a small amount of data; however, most of these methods require pretraining within the relevant domain. Recently, foundation models have demonstrated excellent performance in zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. In this study, we explore the potential of foundation models in plant disease recognition by proposing an efficient few-shot plant disease recognition model (PlantCaFo) based on foundation models. This model operates on an end-to-end network structure, integrating prior knowledge from multiple pretraining models. Specifically, we design a lightweight dilated contextual adapter (DCon-Adapter) to learn new knowledge from training data and use a weight decomposition matrix (WDM) to update the text weights. We test the proposed model on a public dataset, PlantVillage, and show that the model achieves an accuracy of 93.53 ​% in a "38-way 16-shot" setting. In addition, we conduct experiments on images collected from natural environments (Cassava dataset), achieving an accuracy improvement of 6.80 ​% over the baseline. To validate the model's generalization performance, we prepare an out-of-distribution dataset with 21 categories, and our model notably increases the accuracy of this dataset. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our model exhibits superior performance over other models in few-shot plant disease identification.

Indexed as

Efficient funningFew-shot learningFoundation modelsPlant disease recognition

Identifiers

PMID41415957
PMCPMC12709961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.