ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
Integrating UAV remote sensing and semi-supervised learning for early-stage maize seedling monitoring and geolocation.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research and testing of a robot vision-based perception method for assessing corn sowing quality.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- KD-SSGD: knowledge distillation-enhanced semi-supervised germination detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring and managing maize seedlings post-planting is essential for ensuring yield and quality. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technology has been widely integrated for non-destructive detection of maize seedlings. However, significant challenges remain in maize seedling monitoring, such as relatively late monitoring periods, high data annotation costs, and lack of geolocation feedback for missing seedlings. To tackle these issues, this study focused on maize seedlings up to and including the second vegetative leaf (V2) stage. Firstly, the detection performance of both seedlings and missing seedlings was evaluated using a fully labeled dataset, achieving a mean precision of 92.06 %, recall of 87.44 %, and AP50 of 91.23 %. Then, the role of unlabeled data in enhancing the effectiveness of object detection was studied based on the efficient teacher semi-supervised learning framework. Significant improvements were observed when the labeled to unlabeled data ratio ranged from 1:2 to 1:12. The best results for mean precision, recall, and AP50 were improved by 2.69 %, 2.65 %, and 2.35 %, respectively. Additionally, an end-to-end pipeline was developed from image collection to seedling condition analysis, which effectively enhanced the detection of missing seedlings and accurately mapped them to geographical coordinates with an average deviation of 0.462m. This pipeline bridges the gap between missing seedling detection and replanting feedback, providing a feasible and precise detection solution for maize seedlings and supporting efficient field production management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.