ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
A deep learning-based micro-CT image analysis pipeline for nondestructive quantification of the maize kernel internal structure.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enabled Shrinkage Analysis and Morphology Control in Food Processing: Mechanisms, Multimodal Perception, Modeling, and Intelligent Regulation.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- DiffPlantCT: a training-free, annotation-free approach to cross-species plant CT image segmentation.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Integrating AI in seed science: Toward an intelligent design paradigm.Plant communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying and segmenting the vitreous and starchy endosperm of maize kernels is essential for texture analysis. However, the complex internal structure of maize kernels presents several challenges. In CT (computed tomography) images, the pixel intensity differences between the vitreous and starchy endosperm regions in maize kernel CT images are not distinct, potentially leading to low segmentation accuracy or oversegmentation. Moreover, the blurred edges between the vitreous and starchy endosperm make segmentation difficult, often resulting in jagged segmentation outcomes. We propose a deep learning-based CT image analysis pipeline to examine the internal structure of maize seeds. First, CT images are acquired using a multislice CT scanner. To improve the efficiency of maize kernel CT imaging, a batch scanning method is used. Individual kernels are accurately segmented from batch-scanned CT images using the Canny algorithm. Second, we modify the conventional architecture for high-quality segmentation of the vitreous and starchy endosperm in maize kernels. The conventional U-Net is modified by integrating the CBAM (convolutional block attention module) mechanism in the encoder and the SE (squeeze-and-excitation attention) mechanism in the decoder, as well as by using the focal-Tversky loss function instead of the Dice loss, and the boundary smoothing term is weighted as an additional loss term, named CSFTU-Net. The experimental results show that the CSFTU-Net model significantly improves the ability of segmenting vitreous and starchy endosperm. Finally, a segmented mask-based method is proposed to extract phenotype parameters of maize kernel texture, including the volume of the kernel (V), volume of the vitreous endosperm (VV), volume of starchy endosperm (SV), and ratios over their respective total kernel volumes (VV/V and SV/V). The proposed pipeline facilitates the nondestructive quantification of the internal structure of maize kernels, offering valuable insights for maize breeding and processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.