ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025
Fitting maximum crown width height of Chinese fir through ensemble learning combined with fine spatial competition.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate acquisition of forest spatial competition and tree 3D structural phenotype parameters is crucial for exploring tree-environment interactions. However, due to the occlusion between tree crowns, current UAV-based and ground-based LiDAR struggles to capture complete crown information in dense stands, making parameter extraction challenging such as maximum crown width height (HMCW). This study proposes a canopy spatial relationship-based method for constructing forest spatial structure units and employs five ensemble learning techniques to train 11 machine learning model combinations. By coupling spatial competition with phenotype parameters, the study identifies the optimal fitting model for HMCW of Chinese fir. The results demonstrate that the constructed spatial structure units align closely with existing research while addressing issues of incorrectly selected or omitted neighboring trees. Among the 10,191 trained HMCW models, the Bagging model integrating XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Ridge exhibited the best performance. Compared to the best single model (RF), the Bagging model achieved improved accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.