Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415940›Full record

ArticleSankhya. Series B. [Methodological.]2024

Word Embeddings as Statistical Estimators.

Neil Dey, Matthew Singer, Jonathan P Williams, Srijan Sengupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sankhya. Series B. [Methodological.], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neil DeyDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University.
Matthew SingerDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University.
Jonathan P WilliamsDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Centre for Advanced Study, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.
Srijan SenguptaDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University.

Funding

Collaborative Research: Statistical Algorithms for Anomaly Detection and Patterns Recognition in Patient Care and Safety Event ReportsR01LM013309 · NLM · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI FONG, ALLAN, SENGUPTA, SRIJAN · 2019 to 2021
$897k
Hidden Markov methodology for machine learning applied to identifying physiological states of shock in the intensive care unit via biomedical and unstructured text dataR56HL155373 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI WILLIAMS, JONATHAN PAUL · 2021 to 2021
$495k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL155373NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word embeddings are a fundamental tool in natural language processing. Currently, word embedding methods are evaluated on the basis of empirical performance on benchmark data sets, and there is a lack of rigorous understanding of their theoretical properties. This paper studies word embeddings from a statistical theoretical perspective, which is essential for formal inference and uncertainty quantification. We propose a copula-based statistical model for text data and show that under this model, the now-classical Word2Vec method can be interpreted as a statistical estimation method for estimating the theoretical pointwise mutual information (PMI). Next, by building on the work of Levy & Goldberg (2014), we develop a missing value-based estimator as a statistically tractable and interpretable alternative to the Word2Vec approach. The estimation error of this estimator is comparable to Word2Vec and improves upon the truncation-based method proposed by Levy & Goldberg (2014). The proposed estimator also performs comparably to Word2Vec in a benchmark sentiment analysis task on the IMDb Movie Reviews data set.

Identifiers

PMID41415940
PMCPMC12711318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.