Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415939›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2024

Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions.

Samuel Liebana, Matthias Fritsche, Armin Lak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel LiebanaDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthias FritscheDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Armin LakDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 213465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies linking the brain's dopamine signals with learning and decision making have enjoyed enormous progress using predominantly value-based decision-making tasks. However, recent studies have demonstrated pervasive dopamine signaling also during perceptual decision making. These signals have been shown to depend on both feedback and perceptual parameters such as perceptual decision confidence and sensory statistics. Here, we review recent studies investigating dopamine signals in simple and complex forms of perceptual decision tasks across species and dopaminergic circuits. We discuss how reinforcement learning (RL) models can account for key aspects of learning during perceptual decision making and its dopaminergic underpinnings, thus bridging the gap with the literature on dopamine in value-based decisions. Finally, we propose that RL may provide a promising framework to address current challenges in the dopamine literature, such as explaining the function of its heterogeneous responses and its role in learning from naive to expert.

Indexed as

ConfidenceDopamineLearningModelPerceptionReinforcement LearningReward

Identifiers

PMID41415939
PMCPMC7618488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.