ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2025
Evaluation of Empiric Nafcillin Versus Vancomycin for Suspected Late Onset Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare clinical outcomes in neonates receiving empiric vancomycin or nafcillin containing regimens for neonatal late onset sepsis (nLOS).
methodsThis retrospective study evaluated neonates > 72 hours of age initiated on vancomycin/gentamicin (VANC) or nafcillin/gentamicin (NAF) for suspected nLOS. The primary composite endpoint was clinical worsening, defined as a composite of increased respiratory support or vasopressor requirement, both within the first 24 hours, or prolonged bacteremia. Secondary endpoints included acute kidney injury, methicillin-resistant
resultsThe final cohort included 97 neonates (46 VANC, 51 NAF). There was no difference in the clinical worsening composite (VANC 15.2% vs NAF 15.7%; p = 0.95) or in the individual components of the composite. Secondary endpoints did not yield statistically significant differences.
conclusionsUse of nafcillin as the Gram-positive empiric treatment agent did not result in increased clinical worsening compared to vancomycin at our institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.