ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Nociception level index as a tool of measuring pain objectively in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluates the feasibility of using the Nociception Level Index (NOL) as an objective tool for assessing pain in awake patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Traditional pain assessment methods, such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), are subjective and influenced by psychological and cognitive factors, limiting their accuracy in chronic pain conditions. Methods: A single-center, prospective observational study was conducted with 26 CRPS patients. The NOL index, a multi-parameter device measuring autonomic nervous system responses, was assessed alongside VAS scores during physiotherapy exercises and intravenous lidocaine treatment. Pain levels were recorded at baseline, during painful exercises, and post-lidocaine administration. Changes in NOL and VAS scores were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with bootstrapped 95% confidence interval (CI) evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of NOL and VAS in discriminating painful from non-painful states. Results: Physiotherapy exercises significantly increased both NOL (from 22.7 ± 10.7 to 30.3 ± 8.9) and VAS scores (from 5.5 ± 2.8 to 8.15 ± 1.6) ( Conclusions: The NOL index shows promise as a complementary tool for objective pain assessment in CRPS, potentially offering insights into pain dynamics that subjective tools may miss. Further research with larger cohorts and standardized protocols is recommended to validate its clinical utility in chronic pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.