Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415900›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

Drivers and Barriers of Breast Augmentation Surgery: Multinational Insights.

William P Adams, Francisco G Bravo, M Bradley Calobrace, Andre Cervantes, Caroline Glicksman, Craig Layt, Jie Luan, Lina Triana, Per Hedén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

William P Adams
Francisco G Bravo
M Bradley Calobrace
Andre Cervantes
Craig Layt
Jie Luan
Lina Triana
Per Hedén

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although breast augmentation is generally associated with high levels of patient satisfaction, the number of women undergoing the procedure is low. Objectives: To evaluate global key drivers and barriers for women deciding to undergo breast augmentation. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with women aged 18 to 65 years to identify key themes regarding decision-making about breast augmentation. This was followed by a quantitative study with more in-depth analysis conducted in women who had the procedure, who were considering breast augmentation, or who were not considering breast augmentation. Results: In the qualitative interviews ( Conclusions: Given the mix of positive and negative drivers that impact women's decisions regarding breast augmentation, it is essential that physicians educate potential patients regarding surgical details, possible outcomes, and potential procedure-related complications. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).

Identifiers

PMID41415900
PMCPMC12709286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.