ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Safety and Efficacy of a New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Lip Augmentation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lip augmentation has become increasingly accepted and popular. However, there are still a few approved lip fillers that are versatile, biocompatible, suitable for lip enhancement, and backed by large-scale clinical trials. Objectives: To assess the safety and effectiveness of Janlane LIPs (Shanghai Qisheng Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China), a new hyaluronic acid filler for lip augmentation. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study randomized subjects to the treatment group or the concurrent no-treatment control group that received delayed treatment. The level of Lip Fullness Grading Scale (LFS) was evaluated by the blinded evaluator, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was evaluated by the blinded evaluator and the subjects at pre-injection and after injection. Adverse reactions were recorded. Statistical analysis of subject satisfaction was performed. Results: A total of 176 subjects were enrolled. The scores of LFS after injection were higher than those before injection; the degree of GAIS evaluated by the evaluator and subjects improved significantly. Local redness, swelling, etc. occurred after injection, most of which resolved within 1 week. The patient satisfaction was high and statistically significant. Conclusions: Janlane LIPs showed long-term aesthetic improvement and safety for lip augmentation, high patient satisfaction, and are worthy of clinical promotion. Level of Evidence 2 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.