ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
The Balance of Beauty: Pooled Analysis of Adverse Events With a Cohesive Polydensified Matrix-Hyaluronic Acid Filler in Nasolabial Fold Treatments.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are among the most widely used aesthetic treatments, valued for their safety, biocompatibility, and reversibility. Product-specific adverse events (AEs) are important to understand, especially delayed AEs. Objectives: To evaluate the incidence, severity, and risk factors of AEs following nasolabial fold (NLF) treatment with CPM-B (cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid filler with 22.5 mg/ml HA; Belotero Balance®; Anteis S.A., Switzerland) across 5 internal clinical studies. Methods: Pooled data included treatments to 526 NLFs in 412 patients. Adverse events were categorized into 12 subtypes and rated as mild, moderate, or severe. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association of patient (age, sex) and procedure-related factors (injection volume, NLF laterality) with AE risk (≥1 vs 0). Results: Adverse events were observed in 41% of treated NLFs; the majority (97%) were mild, with no severe AEs documented. The most common AEs included swelling (23%), erythema (20%), and bruising/ecchymosis (17%). Adverse event risk significantly increased with injection volume; every additional 100 µl raised the odds of an AE by 2.38 ( Conclusions: This study supports the overall safety and tolerability of CPM-B, with most AEs being mild and transient; only 3.8% were moderate, and none were severe. When controlling for study, volume was the only significant predictor of AE risk, highlighting the need for physicians to minimize excessive volumes where possible. Future studies should explore AE predictors in more diverse populations and investigate additional risk factors to optimize safety and outcomes. Level of Evidence 3 Risk:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.