ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2025
Radiological Insights Into Spina Bifida Occulta in Adults:
Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Spina bifida occulta (SBO) is a congenital spinal defect characterised by incomplete closure of the posterior neural arch. Despite its clinical relevance, discrepancies remain in the published literature. This study aimed to determine the distribution pattern and prevalence of SBO in the Northern Indian population using three-dimensional reconstructed specimens of the lumbosacral spine. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between March 2023 and November 2024 at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna, India. A total of 241 computed tomography (CT) scans of the spine from patients aged over 18 years were analysed. Three-dimensional images were reconstructed using DICOM to Print and Geomagic Freeform Plus software to assess the presence of SBO in the lumbosacral spine. Results: SBO was identified in 48 specimens. Of these, 30 involved the S1 vertebral level, while 8 demonstrated a defect extending from S1 to S5. The overall prevalence of SBO was 19.91% (95% confidence interval: 15.18-25.64%). The defect was significantly more common in males ( Conclusion: Awareness of SBO has important implications for surgical practice. A comprehensive understanding of fusion failure in the spinal column is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. This congenital defect should be carefully considered before performing caudal epidural blocks to reduce the risk of dural puncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.