Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415647›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2025

[The End of Patient Shielding: Rationale for Discontinuing the Practice].

Jae-Yeon Hwang, Young Hun Choi, Hong Eo

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gonadal shielding has been a standard practice in diagnostic radiology for more than 70 years, originally introduced to reduce hereditary risks from ionizing radiation. However, advancements in digital imaging technology have substantially decreased patient radiation doses, and epidemiological studies have not shown any significant genetic risk associated with diagnostic imaging. Current evidence suggests that the potential harms of routine patient shielding, such as increased radiation dose from automatic exposure control malfunction and the possibility of obscuring critical anatomical details, now outweigh its benefits. Consequently, major international organizations, including the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, have recommended discontinuing routine patient shielding, including gonadal and fetal shields. This review summarizes the scientific rationale for this change, outlines the updated global guidelines, and discusses strategies for education and communication to facilitate their implementation. Optimal radiation protection should be achieved through justification and protocol optimization rather than routine patient shielding.

Identifiers

PMID41415647
PMCPMC12710283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.