Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415638›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2025

The Application of Foundation Models in Radiology: Bridging Images, Reports, and Beyond.

Dongheon Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of AI in radiology is rapidly transitioning towards the use of foundation models that learn universal representations from large-scale imaging and multimodal clinical data. In this review, we outline the key technical components of these models, including self-supervised encoders, fusion modules for feature alignment, and task-specific decoders, and further summarize the recent work in three categories: 1) image-only models, trained on millions of unlabeled radiology scans to enable robust transfer learning with minimal annotation, 2) Chest X-ray image-report models, which leverage large chest X-ray-reported corpora for joint visual and textual embedding, and 3) image-report models for other modalities, which fuse volumetric images with structured reports or clinical metadata. We further discuss the relevant evaluation strategies, including vision-centric, language-centric, and benchmark-based metrics, and outline approaches for clinical validation. Finally, we highlight the persistent challenges in the application of these models, and propose future directions for multimodal integration and human-AI collaboration to advance personalized radiology.

Indexed as

Foundation ModelMulti-Modal AIRadiology Image-ReportSelf-Supervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID41415638
PMCPMC12710298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.