Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415633›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2025

PI-RR: A Reporting System for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence Evaluation After Radiation Therapy or Radical Prostatectomy.

June Young Seo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Preface to the Special Issue on Update in Prostate MRI].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochemical recurrence, marked by rising prostate specific antigen levels, is a common and challenging clinical scenario following curative treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa), such as radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). An accurate assessment is critical for detecting local recurrence and distinguishing it from distant metastatic disease, thereby guiding salvage therapies. While multiparametric MRI has demonstrated strong performance in detecting local recurrence, the lack of standardized reporting has historically limited its clinical utility and reproducibility. To address this variability, an international consensus-based Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system was introduced in 2021. PI-RR adopts a 5-point Likert scale, similar to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, but places greater emphasis on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and incorporates knowledge of the prior primary tumor location to grade the likelihood of recurrence. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the PI-RR system, detailing its imaging acquisition recommendations, specific scoring criteria after RT and RP, clinical implications, and future directions within the evolving landscape of PCa imaging.

Indexed as

Biochemical RecurrenceDiffusion-Weighted ImagingDynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRIMultiparametric MRIPI-RRProstate Cancer

Identifiers

PMID41415633
PMCPMC12710292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.