ArticleArXiv2025
needLR: Long-read structural variant annotation with population-scale frequency estimation.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present needLR, a structural variant (SV) annotation tool that can be used for filtering and prioritization of candidate pathogenic SVs from long-read sequencing data using population allele frequencies, annotations for genomic context, and gene-phenotype associations. When using population data from 500 presumably healthy individuals to evaluate nine test cases with known pathogenic SVs, needLR assigned allele frequencies to over 97.5% of all detected SVs and reduced the average number of novel genic SVs to 121 per case while retaining all known pathogenic variants.
Identifiers
41415608PMC12709490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.