ArticleIEEE transactions on affective computing
Datasets of Smartphone Modalities for Depression Assessment: A Scoping Review.
Article in IEEE transactions on affective computing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Text-Based Depression Estimation Using Machine Learning With Standard Labels: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As mobile sensing research for depression assessment is rapidly expanding, it is vital to uncover fundamental patterns and overarching limitations in the datasets available for such research, especially as many analyses are conducted on the same datasets. As such, we conduct a scoping review by identifying 80 datasets through the start of 2024 that contain smartphone modalities and depression labels. These datasets originated from 72 manuscripts and approximately 60 research groups. The most collected smartphone modalities included location and/or activity for 68.75%, communication logs for 47.5%, phone use for 41.25%, vocal utterances for 30%, and WiFi and/or Bluetooth connectivity for 28.75% of the datasets. The PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) were the most popular screening instruments, administered for 53.75% of datasets. Of the 80 datasets, 31.25% recruited from student populations, 22.5% from patient populations, and 7.5% recruited crowdsourced workers. Excluding the nine datasets that did not report demographics, 73% reported a majority of women participants. Given the importance of datasets on analysis outcomes, this scoping review is an invaluable resource to inform the state of science and guide future mobile health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.