ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Beyond Ultra-high Frequency: Clinical Feasibility of 10-12 MHz and Portable Ultrasound in Lymphatic Imaging.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lymphatic Ultrasound Works: Time-efficient Planning and Decision-making for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis-A Narrative Review With Workflow Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor: High-frequency ultrasound is an effective adjunct for lymphatic surgery.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the detection of recurrent conjunctival melanoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphatic ultrasound has recently emerged as a noninvasive, contrast-free modality for evaluating lymphatic vessels, particularly as a preoperative tool for lymphaticovenous anastomosis. Although high-frequency linear probes (18-20 MHz) are commonly used, their availability may be limited, and ultra-high-frequency probes (≥30 MHz) are limited by poor tissue penetration. This study investigated the feasibility of using lower frequency linear probes (10-12 MHz), including a portable 10-MHz device, to visualize lymphatic vessels in patients with extremity lymphedema. A total of 24 limbs from 13 female patients were examined. Dilated lymphatic vessels were first identified using an 18-MHz probe, then reevaluated with either a 12- or 10-MHz probe. Among 44 sites, 86.4% of lymphatic vessels detected with the 18-MHz probe were also visible with lower frequency probes. Identification was more successful in the lower extremities (89.5%) than in the upper extremities (66.7%). Visualization rates were comparable between the 12- (87.0%) and 10-MHz (85.7%) probes. These findings suggest that lower frequency probes, including portable devices, can adequately visualize lymphatic vessels in most cases. This may facilitate wider adoption of lymphatic ultrasound in general clinical settings and resource-limited environments. However, further studies are needed to evaluate their standalone diagnostic performance and ability to assess lymphatic degeneration, and their limitations in de novo identification should also be acknowledged. Addressing these issues may help optimize probe selection and further expand the clinical utility of lymphatic ultrasound.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.