Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415599›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Language, Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance-related Disparities in Blepharoptosis Surgery.

Ayden Case, Jake E Radell, Alice Dalo, Albert Y Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayden CaseFrom the Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Jake E RadellDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.
Alice DaloDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Albert Y WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given that patients' primary language, race, ethnicity, and insurance may affect their healthcare, this study assessed differences in blepharoptosis surgical rates, waiting times, and outcomes in patients across different demographic groups and insurance types. Methods: This retrospective cohort study followed up patients diagnosed with blepharoptosis, with primary outcome measures including blepharoptosis surgical procedure, diagnosis-to-procedure interval, procedure type, and procedure complications. Results: Among 5045 patients diagnosed with blepharoptosis, age at diagnosis differed significantly among ethnic groups, with Hispanic patients presenting younger than the overall cohort (60 versus 64 y). Once diagnosed with blepharoptosis, Hispanic patients underwent surgery at the highest rate (20.8%), followed by Asian (18.5%), White (13.0%), and Black (12.8%) patients. English speakers were least likely to undergo surgery after a blepharoptosis diagnosis (14.3%), whereas Vietnamese (22.8%), Mandarin (21.4%), and Spanish (21.3%) speakers underwent surgery more frequently. Patients needing an interpreter were also more likely to undergo surgery (21.5% versus 14.3%). Conclusions: Hispanic and Asian blepharoptosis patients undergo surgery at a significantly higher rate than White and Black patients. In non-English speakers and for patients requiring an interpreter, surgery also occurs more frequently.

Identifiers

PMID41415599
PMCPMC12711371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.