Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415592›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Acid and Alkali Chemical Assault Burns (Vitriolage): A Systematic Review of Epidemiology.

John Warner-Levy, Zeeshan Sheikh, Karl Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John Warner-LevyFrom the Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Zeeshan SheikhThe Adult Burns Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karl WalshThe Adult Burns Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chemical assaults involve the intentional use of chemicals to cause harm. These attacks frequently occur in domestic settings, with reliable epidemiological data remaining limited. This systematic review sought to explore epidemiological aspects of such incidents. Methods: It included all peer-reviewed reports providing original cases of chemical assaults, detailing at least the number of victims involved, identified through PubMed and Web of Science searches conducted from database inception to May 26, 2024. Results: Globally, the mean age of victims was 29.03 years (SD 11.99 y). Women accounted for 50.71% of the victims, whereas men were 89.01% of the perpetrators. Over half of the victims were illiterate (53.76%), and homemakers represented the most affected occupation (33.84%). Assaults most frequently occurred on the street (47.40%). Acids were the most used substance (70.36%). Victims were more likely to have a preexisting relationship with their perpetrator (58.56%). The most common motive for chemical assaults was land/property disputes (16.72%). The head, face, and eyes accounted for 39.01% of all body parts burned. The mean total body surface area burned was 14.12% (SD 15.42%). Conclusions: Although the results do provide insights, any interpretation must be approached with caution, as several variables are supported by only sparse data. Future recording of chemical assaults requires a more formal and coordinated approach, ideally through databases that involve hospitals, law enforcement, and government agencies.

Identifiers

PMID41415592
PMCPMC12711356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.