ReviewBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2025
Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea-Part 2: Rehabilitation for Motor and Sensory Function (2024).
Review in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of stroke guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021Pooled it
- Korean Version of the Longer-Term Unmet Needs After Stroke Questionnaire.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Stroke Rehabilitation Fact Sheet in Korea.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Transitional and Long-Term Rehabilitation Care System After Stroke in Korea.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Association Between Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit and Sarcopenia Among Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Early Mobilization After Stroke: Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Support Clinicians' Decision-Making?Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Proportion of Aspiration Pneumonia Cases Among Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Single-Center Study in Korea.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This clinical practice guideline (CPG) is the second part of the fourth edition of the Korean Stroke Rehabilitation Guidelines, following the first part published in 2023. While, the first part addressed rehabilitation for motor function, while this second part focuses on both motor and sensory rehabilitation. Beginning with the fourth edition, significant methodological advancements have been introduced, transitioning from a consensus-based approach to an evidence-based framework using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The target population encompasses adult stroke patients, both male and female, with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke types included, while pediatric stroke cases are excluded from consideration. This guideline is primarily intended for physiatrists and specialized therapists who provide rehabilitation services to patients with stroke-related motor impairments and activities of daily living limitations across primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare facilities. The development team consisted of eighteen stroke rehabilitation specialists and one expert in CPG development methodology. Key questions were formulated based on target population preferences and international stroke rehabilitation guidelines, with subsequent refinement by specialists responsible for each respective topic. Draft recommendations underwent a formal consensus process using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, followed by further refinement through public hearings and external expert evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.