Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415589›Full record

ReviewBrain & NeuroRehabilitation2025

Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea-Part 2: Rehabilitation for Motor and Sensory Function (2024).

Hyun Haeng Lee, Yong Wook Kim, Hyoung Seop Kim, Seung Nam Yang, Sun Im, Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Joon-Ho Shin, Min-Kyun Oh, Won-Seok Kim, Da-Sol Kim and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & NeuroRehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Stroke Rehabilitation Fact Sheet in Korea.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Hyun Haeng LeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-6284
Yong Wook KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-2454
Hyoung Seop KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pohang Stroke and Spine Hospital, Pohang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-4802
Seung Nam YangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-0341
Sun ImDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-4911
Woo-Kyoung YooDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-0647
Joon-Ho ShinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6447-8829
Min-Kyun OhDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0258-6298
Won-Seok KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-5707
Da-Sol KimDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-978X
Won Kee ChangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-6817
Seyoung ShinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7834-9494
Sekwang LeeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-2673
Doo Young KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1327-5348
Sung-Hwa KoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-5972
Yeo Jun YunDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7497-4797
Yookyung LeeDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-9848
Miyoung ChoiNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2424-9965
Suk Hoon OhnDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, New Sungmin Hospital, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1139-1946
KSNR Stroke CPG Writing Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This clinical practice guideline (CPG) is the second part of the fourth edition of the Korean Stroke Rehabilitation Guidelines, following the first part published in 2023. While, the first part addressed rehabilitation for motor function, while this second part focuses on both motor and sensory rehabilitation. Beginning with the fourth edition, significant methodological advancements have been introduced, transitioning from a consensus-based approach to an evidence-based framework using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The target population encompasses adult stroke patients, both male and female, with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke types included, while pediatric stroke cases are excluded from consideration. This guideline is primarily intended for physiatrists and specialized therapists who provide rehabilitation services to patients with stroke-related motor impairments and activities of daily living limitations across primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare facilities. The development team consisted of eighteen stroke rehabilitation specialists and one expert in CPG development methodology. Key questions were formulated based on target population preferences and international stroke rehabilitation guidelines, with subsequent refinement by specialists responsible for each respective topic. Draft recommendations underwent a formal consensus process using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, followed by further refinement through public hearings and external expert evaluation.

Indexed as

BiofeedbackClinical Practice GuidelineRoboticsShoulder PainTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41415589
PMCPMC12710289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.