Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415505›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Causal Inference in Studies with Functional Unmasking: Psychedelics and Beyond.

Gabriel Loewinger, Mats J Stensrud, Sandeep M Nayak, David Yaden, Alexander W Levis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriel LoewingerMachine Learning Core, National Institute of Mental Health.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-8520
Mats J StensrudInstitute of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.ORCID 0000-0001-9641-1936
Sandeep M NayakCenter for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-6832-0639
David YadenCenter for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-9604-6227
Alexander W LevisCenter for Causal Inference, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-0292

Funding

Machine Learning TeamZICMH002968 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PEREIRA, FRANCISCO · 2018 to 2025
$13.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical trials for mental health treatments, functional unmasking (unblinding) is a widespread challenge wherein participants become aware of their assigned treatment. Unmasking is especially concerning with psychedelics, due to the near unmistakable acute effects (the "trip"), resulting in uncertainty about whether outcomes following treatment reflect true therapeutic properties of the interventions, or placebo-like effects. We present a counterfactual conceptualization of unmasking that 1) formalizes the shortcomings of many existing statistical and experimental design solutions (e.g., dose-response, active controls), and 2) demonstrates how modern causal inference approaches can be applied to isolate effects devoid of this "contamination." Our results reveal feedback mechanisms between perceived therapeutic benefits and expectancies that can render traditional methods prone to obscuring or exaggerating therapeutic benefits. Our proposal motivates trial designs and statistical methods that can be implemented to mitigate the impacts of functional unmasking.

Indexed as

causal inferencepsychedelicspsychiatryrandomized controlled trialssemi-parametric mediation analysis

Identifiers

PMID41415505
PMCPMC12709464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.