Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415466›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.

Mohammad Amin Fakharian, Elijah A Taeckens, Alexander N Vasserman, Alden M Shoup, Reza Shadmehr

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Amin FakharianLaboratory for Computational Motor Control Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-8689
Elijah A TaeckensLaboratory for Computational Motor Control Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0002-0939-4523
Alexander N VassermanLaboratory for Computational Motor Control Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.ORCID 0009-0002-9794-1984
Alden M ShoupLaboratory for Computational Motor Control Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1206-6587
Reza ShadmehrLaboratory for Computational Motor Control Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0002-7686-2569

Funding

A new theory of population coding in the cerebellumR01EB028156 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHADMEHR, REZA · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
Control of tongue movements by the cerebellumR21NS145008 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHADMEHR, REZA · 2025 to 2025
$427k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028156NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS145008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tend to think of neurons as either excitatory or inhibitory, but certain neurons chemically inhibit their downstream targets while electrically exciting their neighbors. For example, in the cerebellum, molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) inhibit Purkinje cells (P-cells) via release of GABA but promote spiking in each other via gap junctions. What is gained by having an inhibitory neuron excite its neighbor? Here, we recorded activities of P-cells and MLIs as marmosets performed saccadic eye movements and found that spike timing in pairs of neighboring neurons of the same type exhibited a mathematical regularity: as firing rates increased, rate of spikes that were within 1ms of each other grew disproportionately while 2-4ms intervals were suppressed. To uncover the purpose of this coordination, during saccades we recorded thousands of neuron triplets in which two MLIs converged onto a single target P-cell. When the MLIs spiked within 1ms of each other, they produced superposition of their individual effects on their target; a deep inhibition followed by a post-inhibitory rebound. However, when the MLIs spiked 2-4ms apart, the two spikes interfered with each other, producing partial cancellation. Thus, electrical coupling between inhibitory neurons orchestrated their spike timing so that as firing rates increased, the temporal intervals that induced downstream superposition were promoted while the intervals that caused interference were suppressed.

Identifiers

PMID41415466
PMCPMC12710975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.