ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Responses of neurons in macaque V4 to object and texture images.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and monkeys can rapidly recognize objects in everyday scenes. While it is known that this ability relies on neural computations in the ventral stream of visual cortex, it is not well understood where this computation first arises. Previous work suggests selectivity for object shape first emerges in area V4. To explore the mechanisms of this selectivity, we generated a continuum of images between "scrambled" textures and photographic images of both natural and man-made environments, using techniques that preserve the local statistics of the original image while discarding information about scene and shape. We measured image responses from single units in area V4 from two awake macaque monkeys. Neuronal populations in V4 could reliably distinguish photographic from scrambled images, could more reliably discriminate between photographic images than between scrambled images, and responded with greater dynamic range to photographic images than scrambled images. Responses to partially scrambled images were more similar to fully scrambled responses than photographic responses, even for perceptually subtle changes. This same pattern emerged when these images were analyzed with an image-computable similarity metric that predicts human judgements of image degradation (DISTS - Deep Image Structure and Texture Similarity). Finally, analysis of response dynamics showed that sensitivity to differences between photographic and scrambled responses grew slowly, peaked 190 ms after response onset, and persisted for hundreds of milliseconds following response offset, suggesting that this signal may arise from recurrent mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.