Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Investigating the relationship between emotional labor levels, job satisfaction, and burnout among nurse academicians: a structural equation modeling approach.

Nadiye Barış Eren, Leyla Dinç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadiye Barış ErenDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tarsus University, Mersin, Türkiye.
Leyla DinçDepartment of Fundamentals of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurse academicians interact face-to-face with nursing students during the teaching process and with individuals, families, and other healthcare professionals in their practice. This study examined the relationship between emotional labor levels, job satisfaction, and burnout among nurse academicians. Methods: This descriptive correlational study was conducted with 474 participants selected using a stratified sampling method among nursing academics working at public universities in seven geographical regions of Türkiye. Data were collected through the "Descriptive Characteristics Form," the "Emotional Labor Scale," the "Copenhagen Burnout Inventory," and the "Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire." Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, skewness and kurtosis, Results: Nurse academicians generally demonstrated genuine acting and experienced work-related burnout; however, they had high intrinsic job satisfaction. Surface acting and deep acting differed by gender, and we observed a significant relationship between deep acting, marital status, and duration of work. Emotional labor subscales were significant predictors of burnout subscales and job satisfaction. Specifically, surface acting showed a positive association with personal, work-related, and student-related burnout (β = 0.159, Conclusion: Deep acting and genuine acting had positive effects on nurse academicians' job satisfaction, while surface acting increased burnout, genuine acting decreased burnout. Scientific activities are recommended for professional development to enhance the understanding of authentic and deep acting among nursing academics.

Indexed as

academiciansburnoutemotional laborjob satisfactionnursing

Identifiers

PMID41415351
PMCPMC12709624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.