Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415349›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Role of organizational network analyses to advance workforce inclusion and belonging: a scoping literature review.

Patrick L Decker-Tonnesen, Sherry S Chesak, Laura E Walker, Katharina Kohler, Sean Phelan, Marshall S Gunnels, Kara L Saliba, Anjali Bhagra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrick L Decker-TonnesenOffice of Belonging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Sherry S ChesakDivision of Nursing Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Laura E WalkerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Katharina KohlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sean PhelanHealth Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Marshall S GunnelsNursing Administration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Kara L SalibaOffice of Belonging, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Anjali BhagraOffice of Belonging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizational Network Analyses (ONAs) are tools used to explore the strengths and challenges in the human relationships that occur within organizations. ONAs consist of matrices of informal and formal connections that help to identify potential patterns of inclusion and exclusion across organizational systems. Understanding the directions of workplace relationships is critical for advancing workforce inclusion and belonging. To better understand the efficacy of organizational networks for inclusion and belonging, this scoping literature review included fifteen studies that met inclusion criteria and were placed into five categories including: Studies With Gender-Related Outcomes; Studies With Race, Ethnicity, and Culture-Related Outcomes; Studies With Cross Gender-Related and Race, Ethnicity, and Culture-Related Outcomes; Studies With Academic Medical Setting-Related Outcomes; and Studies With Miscellaneous Outcomes. Results demonstrated ONAs are a useful tool for organizations to better understand barriers to inclusion and belonging, including for employee gender and race. Additionally, ONAs help provide information to organizations on network differences and connectivity within groups. The findings of this review warrant future research to further assess how ONAs interact with dimensions of difference and workplace inclusion and belonging.

Indexed as

organizational network analysis (ONA)social networksworkplace belongingnessworkplace dynamicsworkplace inclusion

Identifiers

PMID41415349
PMCPMC12709551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.