Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415323›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

The UK Antimicrobial Registry (UKAR): an overview of the first 20 months of recruitment.

Jacqueline Sneddon, Rebecca Parr, Jay Woods, Ross I R MacDonald, Jonathan A T Sandoe, Ioannis Baltas, R Andrew Seaton, Noha El Sakka, Callum Kaye, Gary J Macfarlane and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jacqueline SneddonBritish Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca ParrEpidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Jay WoodsEpidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Ross I R MacDonaldEpidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4539-7147
Jonathan A T SandoeBritish Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-8677
Ioannis BaltasBritish Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK.
R Andrew SeatonBritish Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2509-0597
Noha El SakkaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Callum KayeAnaesthetics & Critical Care, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Gary J MacfarlaneEpidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2322-3314
Gareth T JonesEpidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-7591
UKAR Study Principal Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The UK Antimicrobial Registry (UKAR) was developed to capture data on real-world usage of recently launched antimicrobial agents. Methods: UKAR is an ongoing prospective registry of adult inpatients prescribed 11 eligible study drugs (cefiderocol, ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane/tazobactam, dalbavancin, delafloxacin, eravacycline, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and oritavancin). Data collected from participants' medical records include demographics, infection site, comorbidities, microbiology isolates and susceptibility, treatment regimen and outcomes. Primary outcome is clinical resolution of infection measured 28 days post cessation of study drug. Results: In the first 20 months, 631 participants were recruited, 56% male, with a median age of 60 years. Overall, 44.8% of patients were treated for lower respiratory tract infection, 18.0% for systemic infections including sepsis and 11.1% for urinary tract infection. Comorbidities were common (>90%), 81% of participants had a documented history of resistant organism colonization and only a small proportion of patients received an eligible study drug while in critical care. For Gram-negative agents ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam predominated, and for Gram-positive agents 94% received dalbavancin. Empirical use was seen in 4.9% of Gram-negative and 66.2% of Gram-positive prescriptions. Where patient outcome was evaluable, infection resolution was seen in 69% and 64% of Gram-negative and Gram-positive participants, respectively. Conclusions: The UKAR provides real-world data on the use of novel antimicrobials confirming they are sometimes used empirically as well as for directed therapy to treat both complex and common infections, and often for multiresistant pathogens. The study is a novel and important resource to support the judicious use of these drugs.

Identifiers

PMID41415323
PMCPMC12708584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.