ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
The UK Antimicrobial Registry (UKAR): an overview of the first 20 months of recruitment.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The UK Antimicrobial Registry (UKAR) was developed to capture data on real-world usage of recently launched antimicrobial agents. Methods: UKAR is an ongoing prospective registry of adult inpatients prescribed 11 eligible study drugs (cefiderocol, ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane/tazobactam, dalbavancin, delafloxacin, eravacycline, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and oritavancin). Data collected from participants' medical records include demographics, infection site, comorbidities, microbiology isolates and susceptibility, treatment regimen and outcomes. Primary outcome is clinical resolution of infection measured 28 days post cessation of study drug. Results: In the first 20 months, 631 participants were recruited, 56% male, with a median age of 60 years. Overall, 44.8% of patients were treated for lower respiratory tract infection, 18.0% for systemic infections including sepsis and 11.1% for urinary tract infection. Comorbidities were common (>90%), 81% of participants had a documented history of resistant organism colonization and only a small proportion of patients received an eligible study drug while in critical care. For Gram-negative agents ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam predominated, and for Gram-positive agents 94% received dalbavancin. Empirical use was seen in 4.9% of Gram-negative and 66.2% of Gram-positive prescriptions. Where patient outcome was evaluable, infection resolution was seen in 69% and 64% of Gram-negative and Gram-positive participants, respectively. Conclusions: The UKAR provides real-world data on the use of novel antimicrobials confirming they are sometimes used empirically as well as for directed therapy to treat both complex and common infections, and often for multiresistant pathogens. The study is a novel and important resource to support the judicious use of these drugs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.