ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Cascading Effects of Overhunting on the Functional Tree Composition of Amazonian Forests.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cascading Effects of Overhunting on the Functional Tree Composition of Amazonian Forests.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The depletion of tropical frugivorous vertebrates due to overhunting may impair natural forest regeneration. Yet our understanding of how the loss of seed dispersers and browsers along hunting pressure gradients can shift plant community composition and, consequently, trait distributions, is still limited. We assessed the cascading effects of hunting pressure on forest composition by examining species-level responses and how these are translated into potential shifts in community traits at different life stages. We sampled 4784 trees and 6132 saplings across 30 forest plots along a gradient of hunting pressure in western Brazilian Amazonia, and compiled plant species data on dispersal mode, seed size, wood density, and leaf mass per area (LMA). We tested how hunting pressure affects sapling recruitment probability and sapling-to-tree (S:T) abundance ratios based on dispersal syndromes and varying seed sizes. We also evaluated whether hunting influences community-weighted mean (CWM) wood density, seed size, and LMA of saplings and adult cohorts. Our results show that overhunted forests exhibit significantly lower sapling recruitment probabilities and sapling-to-tree (S:T) abundance ratios for large-seeded endozoochorous species, particularly those bearing seeds larger than 18 mm. In contrast, abiotically dispersed and scatter-hoarded species exhibited increased recruitment success under high hunting pressure. Hunting pressure had no significant effect on CWMs of wood density, seed size, or LMA for trees and saplings. In our study landscape, up to 249 plant species, encompassing ~⅓ of the species surveyed, may be experiencing seed dispersal limitation and impaired sapling recruitment in heavily hunted forests. Yet, these species-level responses did not scale up to wholesale changes in community-wide plant functional composition, potentially due to time-lag effects. Our study demonstrates that defaunation driven by overhunting triggers early functional shifts in tropical forests by altering plant recruitment patterns, especially for animal-dispersed species, potentially leading to long-term changes in forest structure and carbon storage capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.