Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415315›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Contrasting Patterns of Inbreeding and Inbreeding Depression in Co-Occurring Spotted Turtle and Eastern Box Turtle Populations.

Paige K Madden, Sarah E Carter, Austin C Hulbert, Henry M Streby, Jeanine M Refsnider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paige K MaddenDepartment of Environmental Sciences University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA.
Sarah E CarterDepartment of Environmental Sciences University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA.
Austin C HulbertDepartment of Environmental Sciences University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA.
Henry M StrebyDepartment of Environmental Sciences University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA.
Jeanine M RefsniderDepartment of Environmental Sciences University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-4356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of genetic diversity is critical for preserving a population's ability to adapt to changing selection pressures. As populations become smaller and more isolated, they are more likely to become inbred, which can lead to inbreeding depression and further population decline. Eastern box turtles and spotted turtles co-occur in remnant oak savanna landscapes in Ohio and Michigan, and while both species have experienced population decline due to habitat loss, remaining spotted turtle populations are smaller and more isolated than box turtle populations; thus, spotted turtles may be more vulnerable to inbreeding depression than eastern box turtles. To test this prediction, we estimated population size, measured the total area occupied, home range size, and baseline physiological stress levels in three populations of both eastern box turtles and spotted turtles. We then compared the inbreeding coefficient and two metrics of reproductive success (egg-hatching success and hatchling survival to overwintering) as potential evidence of inbreeding depression between the two species. We found that while spotted turtles had smaller population sizes, occupied smaller habitat patches, had smaller home ranges, and had higher baseline physiological stress levels than box turtles, the box turtle populations had higher inbreeding coefficients. Moreover, lower rates of egg-hatching success and hatchling survival in the box turtle compared to the spotted turtle populations suggest that the box turtle populations may be experiencing inbreeding depression, whereas inbreeding depression was not evident in the spotted turtle populations. Habitat loss and fragmentation may have contributed to inbreeding effects in box turtles by obstructing dispersal that would otherwise promote mating among unrelated conspecifics. A top priority for conserving these vulnerable turtles should be the preservation of intact tracts of habitat, restoring connectivity among sub-populations where possible, and preventing further fragmentation of occupied habitat by roads in order to promote gene flow and random mating.

Indexed as

Clemmys guttataheterophil:lymphocyte ratiohome rangeradio‐telemetryreproductive successTerrapene carolina

Identifiers

PMID41415315
PMCPMC12710428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.