Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415287›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Decoding ascitic immunological niches with multi-modal machine learning reveals prognostic and chemoresistant determinants in ovarian cancer.

Lin Yang, Tianhui He, Jing Wang, Xiaolan Zhang, Lin Zeng, Qinkun Sun, Yuelin Song, Yufei Nie, Xinran Gao, Chunliang Shang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lin Yang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tianhui He *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing WangMass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, United States.
Xiaolan ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qinkun SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuelin SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yufei NieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinran GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunliang ShangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongyan GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malignant ascites in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represent a fluid extension of the tumor microenvironment, embedding immune programs that may inform prognosis and treatment response. We investigated whether ascitic T-cell phenotypes, integrated with clinical variables, improve prediction of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free interval (PFI), and platinum-based drug chemotherapy resistance (P-DCR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 87 patients with FIGO III/IV HGSOC with treatment-naïve ascites treated at Peking University Third Hospital (May 2019-Mar 2024; median follow-up, 33 months). Ascites (>1,000 mL) underwent standardized processing and multiparametric flow cytometry to quantify T-cell subsets. To prevent information leakage, we used repeated nested cross-validation with event-stratified folds: inner folds performed endpoint-specific screening with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR control, redundancy reduction, and multicollinearity checks; clinical covariates were added by incremental contribution testing. Cox proportional hazards, Random Survival Forests (RSFs), and DeepSurv modeled survival endpoints; a random-forest classifier modeled P-DCR. Performance was summarized on outer folds [C-index for survival; receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) for P-DCR]. Model interpretability used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Results: Across endpoints, combined clinical + ascites features outperformed single-source features, with RSF consistently best. Outer-fold testing C-indices for RSF with combined features were 0.72 (OS), 0.70 (PFS), and 0.74 (PFI). The P-DCR classifier achieved a mean AUC of 0.69 with combined features (accuracy, 0.66; sensitivity, 0.70; specificity, 0.62). Feature-count sensitivity analyses showed performance gains plateauing at modest Conclusions: Integrating ascitic immunophenotyping with clinical factors improves risk prediction in HGSOC, with RSF offering robust performance under rigorous, leakage-safe validation. Ascites-resident T-cell states provide complementary, reproducible prognostic signals for survival and platinum response, supporting their potential utility for patient stratification and hypothesis generation for immunomodulatory strategies.

Indexed as

AscitesAscitic FluidDrug Resistance, NeoplasmMachine LearningOvarian NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studiesdeep learningepithelial ovarian cancerimmunological nichesplatinum-based drug chemotherapy resistance predictionsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41415287
PMCPMC12708272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.