ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Decoding ascitic immunological niches with multi-modal machine learning reveals prognostic and chemoresistant determinants in ovarian cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-dependent roles of HtrA2/Omi in ovarian cancer: mitochondrial apoptotic function linking platinum sensitivity and acquired chemoresistance-a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Emerging innovative immunotherapies in malignant ascites: current landscape, challenges and perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant ascites in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represent a fluid extension of the tumor microenvironment, embedding immune programs that may inform prognosis and treatment response. We investigated whether ascitic T-cell phenotypes, integrated with clinical variables, improve prediction of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free interval (PFI), and platinum-based drug chemotherapy resistance (P-DCR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 87 patients with FIGO III/IV HGSOC with treatment-naïve ascites treated at Peking University Third Hospital (May 2019-Mar 2024; median follow-up, 33 months). Ascites (>1,000 mL) underwent standardized processing and multiparametric flow cytometry to quantify T-cell subsets. To prevent information leakage, we used repeated nested cross-validation with event-stratified folds: inner folds performed endpoint-specific screening with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR control, redundancy reduction, and multicollinearity checks; clinical covariates were added by incremental contribution testing. Cox proportional hazards, Random Survival Forests (RSFs), and DeepSurv modeled survival endpoints; a random-forest classifier modeled P-DCR. Performance was summarized on outer folds [C-index for survival; receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) for P-DCR]. Model interpretability used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Results: Across endpoints, combined clinical + ascites features outperformed single-source features, with RSF consistently best. Outer-fold testing C-indices for RSF with combined features were 0.72 (OS), 0.70 (PFS), and 0.74 (PFI). The P-DCR classifier achieved a mean AUC of 0.69 with combined features (accuracy, 0.66; sensitivity, 0.70; specificity, 0.62). Feature-count sensitivity analyses showed performance gains plateauing at modest Conclusions: Integrating ascitic immunophenotyping with clinical factors improves risk prediction in HGSOC, with RSF offering robust performance under rigorous, leakage-safe validation. Ascites-resident T-cell states provide complementary, reproducible prognostic signals for survival and platinum response, supporting their potential utility for patient stratification and hypothesis generation for immunomodulatory strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.