ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Stress and coping among university faculty and staff at a medical university in the post-pandemic context: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational stress among university faculty and staff has been widely documented, with increasing levels reported globally. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced new pressures, and the resumption of on-site work created reintegration challenges that further affected employees' well-being. This study aimed to explore the main stressors, coping mechanisms, and strategies to support faculty and staff at the Medical University of Varna (MU-Varna). Methods: This qualitative study represented the second stage of an investigation into the mental health of MU-Varna employees in the post-COVID period. Data from two focus groups with 24 faculty and staff members were thematically analyzed following Braun and Clarke's approach. Conventions of trustworthiness (credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability) were adhered to in order to ensure rigor. Results: Four key stress-inducing factors were identified: work overload, problematic workplace relationships, administrative and organizational difficulties, and the need for social contact and support. Participants primarily reported constructive coping strategies, such as seeking social support and problem-solving, although some maladaptive behaviors, including self-blame and self-criticism, were also observed. Conclusion: This study contributes to the understanding of occupational stress and coping by focusing on post-pandemic reintegration within a medical university context - a setting that combines academic and clinical responsibilities. The findings extend Lazarus and Folkman's transactional model by revealing culturally and institutionally specific coping responses. The proposed support strategies emphasize training in communication and conflict management, professional development, and team-building to foster resilience and employee well-being in academia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.