Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415225›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Female-friendly residential facilities and living satisfaction: evidence from Yangpu District, Shanghai.

Zhiguo Fang, Jiachen Yao, Jianing Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiguo FangCollege of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Jiachen YaoCollege of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Jianing ShiCollege of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With the acceleration of global urbanization, the development of female-friendly cities has become a key objective in urban planning. This study investigates strategies for optimizing residential community facilities in Yangpu District, Shanghai, from a female-friendly perspective, aiming to inform policymakers and improve the quality of life and satisfaction of women. Methods: Drawing on field surveys conducted across 36 communities and 923 valid questionnaires, descriptive statistical analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed to examine women's daily needs regarding safety, convenience, and opportunities for social interaction. Results: The key findings reveal that, first, the built environment of community facilities significantly influences perceptions of female-friendliness and residential satisfaction, with recreational facilities exerting the strongest impact. Second, the direct relationship between female-friendliness and satisfaction is relatively weak, potentially due to individual differences and variations in environmental contexts. Finally, subjective perception mediates the relationship between the built environment and overall satisfaction. Discussion: Based on these findings, this study proposes a comprehensive strategy: implementing incentive policies and evaluation mechanisms; optimizing spatial layouts, establishing women-specific facilities, and enhancing connectivity; and strengthening facility management and service standards.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentPersonal SatisfactionResidence CharacteristicsResidential FacilitiesAdultChinaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesresidential satisfactionsubjective perceptionsupporting facilitieswomen-friendlyYangpu District

Identifiers

PMID41415225
PMCPMC12708587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.